Quotes · Quote card

Quotation from Aaron v. SEC by Supreme Court of the United States

“The language of § 17(a) strongly suggests that Congress contemplated a scienter requirement under § 17(a)(1), but not under § 17(a)(2) or § 17(a)(3).”

Supreme Court of the United States

Aaron v. SEC, Opinion of the Court (Justice Stewart), Part II (U.S. Reports text (Legal Information Institute))

Portrait of Supreme Court of the United States

Justice Stewart states the clause-by-clause division of Section 17(a) that decides the case.

Citation: "The language of § 17(a) strongly suggests that Congress contemplated a scienter requirement under § 17(a)(1), but not under § 17(a)(2) or § 17(a)(3)." — Supreme Court of the United States, Aaron v. SEC, Opinion of the Court (Justice Stewart), Part II (U.S. Reports text (Legal Information Institute)). (id aaron-v-sec-q1)

Portrait: US Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart - 1976 official portrait, Robert S. Oakes, Public domain.

Download card (PNG)

Quote card: The language of § 17(a) strongly suggests that Congress contemplated a scienter