Work record

A Treatise on Political Economy

Also known as: Traité d'économie politique · Treatise on Political Economy · Say's law

1803 · 19th Century · Political Theory · French

Abstract

Written
first published 1803; revised editions 1814, 1817, 1819 and 1826; English translation 1821
Setting
France under the Consulate and the Restoration, 1803-1826; France and Britain, with examples from Europe, the Americas and Asia
Author
Jean-Baptiste Say; trans. C. R. Prinsep (1821), ed. Clement C. Biddle
Country
French Republic under the Consulate (France)
Language
French
Genre
Treatise on political economy
Form
Prose treatise in an introduction and three books of numbered chapters, with notes
Recommended
Grades 11–12 (Clear but long early-19th-century treatise; read selected chapters.)

Background. In 1803 a Paris journalist and member of the Tribunate published a two-volume work introducing Smith's economics to French readers. When he declined to rewrite parts of it to suit the First Consul's policies, he lost his seat and turned to running a cotton mill.

Method. Economics is presented as an observational science resting on a few general facts, separate from the art of government and from the gathering of numbers. Earlier mercantilist and physiocratic doctrines are reviewed and rejected.

Production. Every activity that creates usefulness is productive, including trade and services. Output requires scientific knowledge, enterprise and manual work, assisted by capital and natural agents. Because goods are bought with other goods, supply in one sector furnishes the purchasing power for others.

Distribution and use. Income flows to those who furnish work, capital and land; spending is judged by whether it reproduces value; public outlays and taxes are weighed by what they cost the producers who fund them.

Edition. The library text is the Prinsep translation from the fourth French edition, as reissued with American notes by Clement Biddle in 1855. Biddle's two prefatory advertisements come first, followed by the author's own introduction and the three books; the closing chapters on taxes and public borrowing draw on British and American figures.

Key figures

  • Jean-Baptiste Say: French economist, journalist and manufacturer
  • Adam Smith: Scottish economist whose work Say set out to systematize
  • The physiocrats: French school, led by Quesnay, who held agriculture alone productive
  • Napoleon Bonaparte: First Consul whose government removed Say from the Tribunate
  • Clement C. Biddle: Philadelphia editor of the American edition

Summary

A Treatise on Political Economy is Jean-Baptiste Say's systematic account of how wealth is produced, distributed and consumed. It first appeared in Paris in 1803, under the Consulate, and Say revised it through five French editions in his lifetime. The English translation by C. R. Prinsep (1821), made from the fourth edition, was republished in the United States with notes by Clement C. Biddle and became a standard American college text; the library uses the Biddle edition of 1855. Say set out to make Adam Smith's ideas clear and orderly. In a long Introduction he defines political economy as a science of general facts drawn from observation, distinguishes it from politics and from statistics, and reviews earlier schools, including the mercantilists and the French physiocrats, who held that only agriculture is productive. Book I, on production, argues that to produce is to create utility, so that manufacturing, commerce and services are as productive as farming. Say describes the roles of the scientist, the entrepreneur, whom the translation calls the master-agent or adventurer, and the labourer; the agency of capital and natural resources; money; and the effects of government regulation. Its fifteenth chapter states the law of markets: since products are ultimately paid for with other products, the creation of goods itself provides the demand for goods, and a general glut of all commodities cannot persist; what appear to be gluts are imbalances between particular products. Book II, on distribution, explains how value is shared as revenue among those who supply industry, capital and land, through wages, interest, profits and rent, and discusses population. Book III, on consumption, distinguishes productive from unproductive consumption, examines private and public spending, and ends with chapters on taxation and the national debt. Throughout Say favours free trade and limited government, warns against bounties and monopolies, and treats thrift as the source of capital. His law of markets was debated by Malthus and Sismondi in his own day, and was later challenged by John Maynard Keynes, while the attention he gave to entrepreneurship influenced later economists. Napoleon's displeasure at the book's free-market views cost Say his public post, a reminder that economic argument and political power were closely linked in Say's France.

Plot or Argument

  • Introduction

    Political economy is a science of general facts, like the exact sciences, distinct from politics and statistics. Say reviews the mercantile system and the physiocrats and praises Adam Smith while criticizing his lack of order.

  • Book I: Production

    Production is the creation of utility. Industry in agriculture, manufacture and commerce, aided by capital and natural agents, produces wealth; the operations of science, enterprise and labour are distinguished, and the effects of money and of government regulation examined.

  • The law of markets

    In Book I, Chapter XV, Say argues that products are paid for with products, so that the creation of one product opens a market for others; general overproduction is impossible, and the encouragement of mere consumption does not help trade.

  • Book II: Distribution

    Value produced is divided as revenue among those who furnish industry, capital and land. Say treats prices, the profits of the master-agent or adventurer, wages, interest, rent and the causes of population growth.

  • Book III: Consumption

    Consumption destroys value, productively when it creates new value and unproductively otherwise. Say discusses private consumption, saving, luxury, public consumption, taxation and the national debt.

    Lessons

    • Supply creates its means of purchase

      Say's law of markets holds that people pay for what they buy with what they produce, so a growing economy creates its own markets. The idea, later disputed by Keynes, remains central to debates over recessions and stimulus.

      • Why does Say think a general glut of all goods is impossible?
      • What role does money play in his argument, and is it as neutral as he assumes?
    • All useful work is productive

      Against the physiocrats, Say argues that manufacturers, merchants and providers of services create value just as farmers do, because production means creating utility.

      • How does Say define production?
      • Why does it matter whether services count as productive?
    • The entrepreneur

      Say gives a distinct role to the person who combines knowledge, capital and labour and bears the risk of an enterprise, translated here as the master-agent or adventurer. Later theories of entrepreneurship build on this idea.

      • What qualities does Say think a successful adventurer in industry needs?
      • Why does he think the profits of enterprise are often high?

    Context

    Say wrote after the French Revolution, during Napoleon's Consulate, when France was rebuilding its institutions and debating tariffs, money and public finance. Smith's Wealth of Nations had been translated into French, but Say thought it disorganized; he wanted a clear, systematic science that could guide a free society, and he opposed the mercantilist policies Napoleon favoured.

    Composition

    The first edition appeared in Paris in 1803. Napoleon's government suppressed a second edition, and it appeared only after his fall, in 1814, followed by further editions in 1817, 1819 and 1826. C. R. Prinsep translated the fourth edition into English in 1821, and Clement C. Biddle of Philadelphia issued American editions with his own notes from 1821 onward; the library uses the 1855 printing.

    Reception

    The Treatise was widely read in Europe and became one of the most popular economics textbooks in American colleges before the Civil War. Ricardo, Malthus and Sismondi debated Say's law of markets in Say's lifetime; a century later Keynes made it a target of his General Theory (1936), and it remains a point of contention between economic schools.

    Comparisons

    • The Wealth of Nations

      Say set out to give Smith's ideas a clearer, more systematic form, while correcting him on productive labour and adding the entrepreneur.

    • On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation

      Ricardo accepted Say's law of markets but argued with him over value and rent; the two corresponded and met.

    • Principles of Political Economy

      Mill defended Say's law in his chapter on excess of supply and absorbed Say's broader view of production.

    • The Law

      Bastiat continued Say's French liberal tradition of free trade and limited government, arguing in a more popular and polemical style.

    • Capital, Volume I

      Marx criticized Say's law, arguing that the separation of sale and purchase through money makes crises possible.

    • Human Action: A Treatise on Economics

      Mises defended Say's law against Keynes and placed entrepreneurship at the centre of his account of the market process.

    • Principles of Economics

      Say's emphasis on utility anticipated themes that Menger developed into a full subjective theory of value.

    Quotes

    “Political economy, in the same manner as the exact sciences, is composed of a few fundamental principles, and of a great number of corollaries or conclusions, drawn from these principles.”
    — Jean-Baptiste Say, A Treatise on Political Economy, Introduction, trans. C. R. Prinsep (1821), American edition ed. C. C. Biddle.Quote card
    “the encouragement of mere consumption is no benefit to commerce; for the difficulty lies in supplying the means, not in stimulating the desire of consumption”
    — Jean-Baptiste Say, A Treatise on Political Economy, Book I, Chapter XV: Of the demand or market for products, trans. C. R. Prinsep (1821), American edition ed. C. C. Biddle.Quote card

    For Students

    A reading companion for classical Christian high school students. See the student guide.

    Reading Guide

    Watch for

    • How the Introduction defines political economy as a science of general facts.
    • Say's definition of production as the creation of utility.
    • The argument of Book I, Chapter XV on the demand or market for products.
    • The role Say gives to the master-agent or adventurer in industry.
    • His treatment of public spending, taxation and debt in Book III.

    Key terms and names

    Utility
    The capacity of a thing to satisfy human wants; for Say, to produce is to create utility.
    Law of markets (Say's law)
    The principle that products are paid for with products, so that production creates the means of demand and a general glut cannot persist.
    Master-agent or adventurer
    The translation's term for the entrepreneur, who combines knowledge, capital and labour and bears the risks of an enterprise.
    Physiocrats
    Eighteenth-century French economists who held that only agriculture produces a net surplus.
    Productive consumption
    Use of goods that leads to the creation of new value, as opposed to consumption that simply destroys value.
    Glut
    An excess of goods that cannot be sold at a price covering costs.

    Seminar Questions

    1. Comprehension How does Say define political economy, and how does he distinguish it from politics?
    2. Comprehension Why does Say reject the physiocrats' claim that only agriculture is productive?
    3. Comprehension What does Say mean when he says that a product, once created, affords a market for other products?
    4. Interpretation Why does Say think that encouraging consumption does not help commerce?
    5. Interpretation What is distinctive about the adventurer in industry compared with the capitalist and the labourer?
    6. Interpretation How does Say's experience under Napoleon help explain his suspicion of government regulation?
    7. Big Question Does a healthy economy depend more on people's ability to produce or on their willingness to spend?

    Faith Connections

    • Proverbs 14:23 (Scripture)

      In all labour there is profit: Say's view that every kind of useful work creates value fits the proverb's praise of labour over mere talk.

    • Luke 16:10-12 (Scripture)

      The parable of the faithful steward links stewardship in small things to larger trust, a theme close to Say's emphasis on thrift and productive use of resources.

    • John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory (1936) (Great Conversation)

      Keynes's argument that demand can fall short of supply is the most famous reply to Say and frames the modern debate.

    Logic and Rhetoric

    Central argument: Production is the creation of utility by industry, capital and natural agents. Because products are ultimately exchanged for other products, production itself supplies the demand for goods; therefore the way to prosperity is to encourage production through security of property, free trade and moderate taxes rather than to stimulate consumption or protect particular industries.

    Rhetorical device: anticipating an objection. Say imagines a tradesman who says he wants money, not other products, for his woollens, and answers that his customers can pay him only out of what they themselves have produced.

    Debate: Resolved: that a general overproduction of goods is impossible.

    Memory Work

    it is production which opens a demand for products.

    Book I, Chapter XV: Of the demand or market for products, trans. C. R. Prinsep (1821), American edition ed. C. C. Biddle. The shortest statement of Say's law, often quoted in debates over economic policy.

    a product is no sooner created, than it, from that instant, affords a market for other products to the full extent of its own value.

    Book I, Chapter XV: Of the demand or market for products, trans. C. R. Prinsep (1821), American edition ed. C. C. Biddle. Gives the fuller form of the law in Say's own words.

    Writing Prompts

    Essay: State Say's law of markets in your own words, explain how Say defends it, and assess it in light of an economic downturn you have read about.

    Comparison with On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation: Say and Ricardo were contemporaries who agreed about markets but disagreed about value. Compare Say's emphasis on utility with Ricardo's on labour, and argue which offers the better explanation of prices.

    Creative Prompts

    • Classroom

      Model a small barter economy of bakers, tailors and carpenters; then introduce money and a sudden urge to hoard it, and discuss whether Say's law still holds.

    • Dialogue

      Write a debate in 1820 between Say and Thomas Malthus over whether a nation can produce more than it is able to buy.

    • Essay

      Say lost his public office rather than rewrite his book to please Napoleon. Write an essay on the responsibilities of economists and other experts when their findings displease those in power.

    Further Reading

    • The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith

    • Letters to Mr. Malthus, Jean-Baptiste Say

      Say's replies to Malthus on gluts and the law of markets.

    • The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, John Maynard Keynes

      The best-known twentieth-century challenge to Say's law.

    Verification notes

    Full text from the Online Library of Liberty edition of Prinsep's translation as edited by Biddle (1855); all quotations are matched against the stored text. The Biddle edition revises Prinsep's 1821 translation and adds notes, so it differs in places from Prinsep's original printing. Biographical and publication facts follow standard reference accounts.

    • Exact extent of Biddle's revisions to Prinsep's 1821 translation in the 1855 printing.