Work record
Parts of Animals
AristotleParts of Animals by Aristotle (c. 350–322 BC)Parts of Animals is Aristotle's treatise on why living things are built as they are.c. 350-322 BC · Ancient · Philosophy · Greek
Summary
Parts of Animals is Aristotle's treatise on why living things are built as they are. Where the History of Animals collects the facts (which creatures have lungs, horns, gills or teeth), this work asks for the causes, and especially for the cause Aristotle thought biologists must look to first: what each part is for. William Ogle's 1911 Oxford translation is attached. Book I is a short essay on biological method. Aristotle argues that in nature, as in the crafts, the end for which a thing comes to be is prior in explanation to the matter it is made of; a house exists for shelter, and bricks and timber are arranged for that end. He criticizes earlier thinkers, Empedocles above all, for explaining bodies by material necessity alone, and he criticizes dividing animals by simple dichotomies. Then he defends the study of animals against those who prefer the heavens. The stars are nobler, but animals are near at hand and can be known more completely, and no creature is too humble to study. He recalls Heraclitus telling hesitant visitors to come into his kitchen because there were gods there too, and says that every kind of animal reveals something natural and something beautiful. Books II to IV apply the method. Aristotle distinguishes the uniform parts (blood, fat, marrow, bone, flesh) from the non-uniform organs built out of them (heart, lung, face, hand) and explains both by the work they do. The heart is the first part to form in the embryo, the source of the blood and the seat of sensation; the brain, cold and moist, exists to temper the heart's heat and brings on sleep. The lungs cool, the diaphragm separates the nobler upper body from the region of nutrition, and laughter at tickling is traced to the warming of the midriff, which is why only man laughs. Horns, tusks, teeth and beaks are compared across species, with the rule that nature makes nothing in vain and does not give the same defensive weapon twice. The fourth book treats bloodless animals (cephalopods, crustaceans, insects), the parts of birds, fish and seals, and man, whose upright posture fits his divine nature and whose hands are many tools in one. Against Anaxagoras, who said man is wisest because he has hands, Aristotle answers that man has hands because he is wisest. Many of its particular claims are wrong; Aristotle located thought in the heart, not the brain. Yet its insistence on comparing structures across species, on dissection and observation, and on asking what a part does made it a founding text of biology. Galen built his own anatomy on its plan and quarrelled with its cardiocentrism, Harvey still argued with it, and Darwin later praised Aristotle as an observer. For students it raises a lasting question: is purpose a real feature of living things or only a way of speaking about them?
Plot or Argument
- Book I: the canons of natural science
An educated person should be able to judge a method. Aristotle sets the final cause before the material cause, rejects explanation by necessity alone, criticizes classification by dichotomy, and defends the study of humble animals as a source of wonder and knowledge.
- Book II: uniform parts and the head
Hot and cold, solid and fluid are defined; blood, fat, marrow, bone, cartilage and flesh are explained by function. The brain is treated as a cooling counterweight to the heart, followed by the senses, the face, teeth, mouth and tongue.
- Book III: horns, teeth and the internal organs
Horns and tusks as weapons; the neck, windpipe and oesophagus; the heart as origin of the vessels and sensation; lung, liver, spleen, kidneys and bladder; the diaphragm and the explanation of laughter; the stomachs of ruminants.
- Book IV: bloodless animals and external parts
The internal organs of insects, crustaceans, cephalopods and shellfish; then the external parts of the blooded animals: the legs and wings of birds, the fins of fishes, the seal and the ostrich as intermediates, and man's upright posture, breast, arms and hands.
Lessons
Even the kitchen has its gods
Aristotle urges students not to recoil from studying worms, shellfish or the inside of the body. Every animal shows design and beauty to someone who looks for causes. The passage is an early defence of curiosity about the ordinary world.
- Why does Aristotle say a picture of an animal can please us more easily than the animal itself?
- What is the point of the Heraclitus story?
- How does this passage compare with Psalm 104 on the creatures?
What a part is for
Book I places the final cause first: to understand a hand or a horn, ask what it does, then ask what matter and process make that possible. Aristotle does not deny material necessity; he denies that it is enough.
- Explain the house analogy for final causes in your own words.
- Where does Aristotle admit that some features exist by necessity rather than for an end?
- Is it legitimate for a modern biologist to ask what an organ is for?
Hands follow intelligence
Aristotle reverses Anaxagoras: nature gives the flute to the flute-player, so man has hands because he is intelligent, not intelligent because he has hands. The hand is many instruments in one because the mind that uses it can do many things.
- Restate the flute-player argument.
- What does it imply about how nature distributes organs?
- Does the argument still persuade you?
Brilliant and mistaken
Aristotle's comparative method was sound, yet he held that the brain cools the heart and that sensation begins in the heart. Students can admire a great observer while noticing how conclusions depend on the evidence and instruments available.
- What observations led Aristotle to think the heart was the origin of the blood?
- Why might he have thought the brain was cold?
- What should we learn from a great scientist's errors?
Context
Aristotle's biological works (History of Animals, Parts of Animals, Generation of Animals and shorter treatises) make up about a quarter of his surviving writings. Much of the observation probably dates from his years at Assos and on Lesbos (c. 347-343 BC), where he and Theophrastus studied marine life, and was organized later at the Lyceum in Athens.
Composition
The treatise cannot be precisely dated; it presupposes the History of Animals and was probably revised over years of teaching. Book I may have been composed separately as an introduction to the whole biological course. Ogle's translation first appeared in 1882 and was revised for the Oxford Works of Aristotle in 1911.
Reception
Galen's On the Usefulness of the Parts follows the plan of this treatise while arguing for the brain and nerves against Aristotle's heart-centred account. Arabic and Latin translations spread it through the medieval schools, Harvey's work on the heart engaged its claims, and Darwin, after reading Ogle's translation, wrote that Linnaeus and Cuvier were mere schoolboys to old Aristotle.
Comparisons
- History of Animals
The History of Animals gathers the facts of anatomy and behaviour; Parts of Animals explains them by function, so the two are best read as data and theory.
- Generation of Animals
The companion treatise applies the same causes to reproduction and embryology, extending the claim here that the heart forms first.
- Galen: Selected Works
Galen adopted Aristotle's teleology but answered his cardiocentrism with dissections of nerves and brain; set the two on the seat of sensation.
- On the Motion of the Heart and Blood in Animals (De Motu Cordis)
Harvey, an admirer of Aristotle, kept the heart at the centre of the body but overturned the account of blood formed in it and carried outward without return.
- On the Origin of Species
Darwin explains the fit between organ and function by natural selection rather than by nature acting for an end; compare how each accounts for horns, teeth and vestigial parts.
Quotes
“Every realm of nature is marvellous”
“for each and all will reveal to us something natural and something beautiful”
“The brain, then, tempers the heat and seething of the heart”
“For nature never makes anything superfluous or in vain”
“we must conclude that man does not owe his superior intelligence to his hands, but his hands to his superior intelligence”
Medical Lens
A foundational text for the history of anatomy and physiology. Aristotle appeals to dissection and embryology to argue that the heart is the origin of the blood vessels, the first organ formed and the seat of sensation, and he gives the brain the subordinate role of cooling the heart and inducing sleep. Galen's anatomy was built in dialogue with this work, and the dispute between heart and brain as the seat of mind ran from Alexandria to the Renaissance. The account of laughter as the warming of the midriff and of morbid changes in the hearts of diseased animals are early physiological explanations, now superseded.
- Book II, Part 7
The brain as a cold, moist counterweight that tempers the heat of the heart and produces sleep by chilling the blood that rises after food.
- Book III, Part 4
The heart as the first part formed and the fountain of the blood, demonstrated by dissection and embryology; animals dying of disease show morbid changes of the heart.
- Book III, Part 10
The diaphragm separates the upper and lower body; tickling warms it and causes involuntary laughter, which Aristotle says is peculiar to man.
Creative Prompts
- Classroom
Choose one animal part (a woodpecker's beak, a cat's claw) and write two explanations, one Aristotle's 'what is it for' and one 'what is it made of and how did it form'.
- Essay
Defend or attack Aristotle's claim that man has hands because he is intelligent, using the flute-player argument and one example of your own.
- Dialogue
Write a conversation between Aristotle and Galen over a dissected heart and brain about where sensation begins.
Further Reading
- History of Animals, Aristotle
The data on which this treatise builds.
- On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body, Galen
Galen's teleological anatomy, modelled on Aristotle.
- The Lagoon: How Aristotle Invented Science, Armand Marie Leroi
A biologist's account of Aristotle's zoology.
- On the Motion of the Heart and Blood in Animals, William Harvey
Verification notes
Rewritten from the attached Ogle translation; part numbers follow the Internet Classics Archive divisions. The Darwin remark comes from his 1882 letter to Ogle; quotes have not been run through verify-quotes.
- Dating of Aristotle's biological research to Assos and Lesbos is a scholarly reconstruction.
- Ogle's first edition year (1882) should be confirmed.