Work record
Proslogion
Anselm of CanterburyProslogium; Proslogion; Faith Seeking UnderstandingProslogion by Anselm of Canterbury (1077–1078)The Proslogion is a short Latin work in twenty-six chapters, written by Anselm at the abbey of Bec in 1077 and 1078.Also known as: Proslogium · Proslogion · Faith Seeking Understanding
1077–1078 · Medieval · Philosophy · Latin
Abstract
Background. Having finished one long treatise built from many linked proofs, a Norman prior wanted something simpler: one line of reasoning able to show both that God is and what God is like. The idea came to him, he says, after long struggle, and he wrote it down as a prayer.
Prayer. The opening chapter urges the soul to leave its busy thoughts and seek the face of God, confessing that understanding grows from trust rather than the reverse.
Proof. Next comes the famous reasoning. Whoever hears the phrase 'something than which nothing greater can be thought' grasps it, even an unbeliever. Yet what is only imagined is less than what is also real; so that supreme being must be real, and cannot even coherently be denied.
Attributes. Later chapters draw out what such a being must be: just and merciful at once, all-powerful, eternal and boundlessly great, beyond even what can be thought. The book closes in longing for heavenly joy.
Legacy. A fellow monk's 'perfect island' objection began a debate that drew in Aquinas, Descartes, Kant and many since. Critics still ask whether any definition can guarantee that its object exists. This library presents the whole book in Deane's 1903 translation, without Gaunilo's reply.
Key figures
- Anselm: Prior of Bec and author
- The fool: The denier of God from Psalm 14 whom the argument addresses
- Gaunilo: Monk who soon wrote a reply in the fool's defence
Summary
The Proslogion is a short Latin work in twenty-six chapters, written by Anselm at the abbey of Bec in 1077 and 1078. In the preface Anselm explains that after writing the Monologion, a long chain of arguments about God, he looked for a single argument that would by itself prove that God exists and is the supreme good. He first called the book Faith Seeking Understanding. The work is written as a prayer addressed to God. Chapter 1 is a moving meditation in which Anselm asks God to teach him to seek and to show himself, and says that he does not seek to understand in order to believe, but believes in order to understand. Chapters 2 to 4 contain the famous argument later called the ontological argument. God is a being than which nothing greater can be conceived. Even the fool of the Psalms, who says in his heart there is no God, understands this idea, so it exists in his understanding. But a being that existed in reality as well as in the mind would be greater than one that existed only in the mind; therefore the being than which nothing greater can be conceived must exist in reality. Indeed, God cannot even be conceived not to exist. The remaining chapters explore what follows: that God is everything it is better to be than not to be, just, merciful, all-powerful, unchanging and eternal, and greater than can be conceived. The book ends with a meditation on the joy of heaven. A monk named Gaunilo soon replied with a defence of the fool, arguing that the same reasoning could prove the existence of a perfect island; Anselm answered him. The argument has been debated ever since, rejected by Thomas Aquinas and Kant and defended in various forms by Descartes, Leibniz and modern philosophers.
Plot or Argument
- Preface
Anselm explains his search for a single argument and the book's original title, Faith Seeking Understanding.
- Chapter 1: A prayer for understanding
An exhortation to the mind to seek God, and Anselm's statement that he believes in order to understand.
- Chapters 2–4: The argument
God is that than which nothing greater can be conceived; such a being must exist in reality and cannot be conceived not to exist; the fool's denial is explained.
- Chapters 5–23: The divine attributes
God's justice and mercy, power, eternity and simplicity, and how he is greater than can be conceived.
- Chapters 24–26: Joy
A meditation on the goodness of God and the fullness of joy promised to the blessed.
Lessons
Faith seeking understanding
Anselm starts from belief and uses reason to understand it more deeply. The book shows that prayer and rigorous argument can go together.
- What does Anselm mean by believing in order to understand?
- Does starting from faith make an argument less rational?
How the argument works
From the idea of a greatest conceivable being, Anselm argues that such a being must exist, since existing in reality is greater than existing only in thought. Following each step carefully is a training in logic.
- Restate the argument of chapter 2 in your own words.
- Which premise seems weakest to you, and why?
Critics and replies
Gaunilo, Aquinas and Kant raised objections that philosophers still discuss. Studying the debate teaches how to test an argument and answer objections fairly.
- How does Gaunilo's perfect island challenge Anselm?
- Why might Anselm say God is unlike an island?
For the Christian reader
The Proslogion is written as prayer as well as proof. Anselm begins by asking God for help and ends with longing for the joy of heaven. Read it with Psalm 14:1 and Psalm 27:8.
- Why does Anselm frame his argument as a prayer?
- How might thinking hard about God be a form of worship?
Context
In the eleventh century, monasteries such as Bec in Normandy were centres of learning. Teachers revived the study of logic, and Anselm, a student of Lanfranc, applied careful reasoning to Christian belief, preparing the way for the scholastic theology of the universities.
Composition
Anselm wrote the Proslogion at Bec in 1077–1078, soon after the Monologion, while he was prior of the abbey. The monk Gaunilo of Marmoutiers wrote a reply on behalf of the fool, and Anselm asked that both the reply and his answer be copied with the book.
Reception
The argument was little used for a century and a half, then was criticized by Thomas Aquinas. It was revived by Descartes and Leibniz, named the ontological argument after Kant attacked it, and remains a central topic in the philosophy of religion.
Comparisons
- On First Principles (De Principiis)
Origen also sought to understand the faith through reason, though by building a speculative system rather than a single argument.
- Confessions
Augustine's Confessions, which Anselm knew well, likewise addresses God in prayer while reasoning about him.
- Summa Theologica
Thomas Aquinas rejected Anselm's argument and offered his own five ways to prove God's existence.
- Meditations on First Philosophy
Descartes revived an argument from the idea of a perfect being in his fifth meditation.
Quotes
Frequently cited
“For I do not seek to understand that I may believe, but I believe in order to understand.”
Frequently cited
“we believe that thou art a being than which nothing greater can be conceived”
For Students
A reading companion for classical Christian high school students. See the student guide.
Reading Guide
Watch for
- The prayer of chapter 1 and the line about believing in order to understand.
- The definition of God at the start of chapter 2.
- The step from existing in the understanding to existing in reality.
- Chapter 3's claim that God cannot be conceived not to exist.
Key terms and names
- Ontological argument
- An argument for God's existence from the concept of God alone, a name given after Kant.
- The fool
- The person of Psalm 14 who 'hath said in his heart, There is no God'.
- Faith seeking understanding
- Anselm's motto: using reason to understand what one already believes.
- A priori
- Known by reasoning alone, without depending on experience.
- Gaunilo
- Monk of Marmoutiers who first answered the argument with his perfect island.
Seminar Questions
- Comprehension How does Anselm define God in chapter 2?
- Comprehension Why does Anselm say even the fool has God in his understanding?
- Interpretation Is existing in reality really 'greater' than existing only in the mind?
- Interpretation How might Anselm answer Gaunilo's perfect island?
- Interpretation Why does Anselm say in chapter 15 that God is greater than can be conceived, and how does that fit the argument of chapter 2?
- Big Question Can reasoning alone prove that anything exists?
Faith Connections
- Psalm 14:1 (Scripture)
'The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God': the verse Anselm sets out to answer.
- Isaiah 7:9 (Scripture)
In the Latin version, 'unless you believe, you will not understand', echoed in chapter 1.
- Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica I.2 (Great Conversation)
Aquinas's reply to Anselm and his own proofs from the world.
Logic and Rhetoric
Central argument: God is that than which nothing greater can be conceived; a being that exists in reality is greater than one that exists only in the mind; therefore God exists in reality.
Rhetorical device: reductio ad absurdum. If the greatest conceivable being existed only in the mind, a greater one could be conceived, which is a contradiction.
Debate: Resolved: that Anselm's ontological argument succeeds in proving God's existence.
Memory Work
For I do not seek to understand that I may believe, but I believe in order to understand.
we believe that thou art a being than which nothing greater can be conceived
Writing Prompts
Essay: Present Anselm's argument in chapters 2–3 and evaluate the strongest objection to it.
Comparison with Meditations on First Philosophy: Compare Anselm's argument with Descartes's argument from the idea of a perfect being.
Creative Prompts
- Essay
Write a dialogue between Anselm and Gaunilo in which each states his position as strongly as possible.
- Classroom
Diagram the argument of chapters 2 and 3 as numbered premises and a conclusion, then vote on which premise is most open to doubt.
- Essay
Explain why Anselm writes his proof in the form of a prayer and what that adds to the argument.
Further Reading
- Monologion, Anselm of Canterbury
- Why God Became Man (Cur Deus Homo), Anselm of Canterbury
- In Behalf of the Fool, Gaunilo of Marmoutiers
The first critique of the argument, printed with the Proslogion.
Verification notes
Full text from Sidney Norton Deane's translation (Open Court, 1903) via CCEL, with notes removed; complete (Preface and 26 chapters). Gaunilo's reply and Anselm's answer, printed in the same volume, are not included. Quotations matched to the stored text.
No verification flags recorded.