Work record
The First Apology
Justin MartyrApologia Prima; First Apology of Justin MartyrThe First Apology by Justin Martyr (c. 155)The First Apology is a defence of Christianity written in Greek by Justin, a convert and teacher of philosophy at Rome, and addressed to the emperor Antoninus Pius, his adopted sons Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus, the Senate and the Roman people.Also known as: Apologia Prima · First Apology of Justin Martyr
c. 155 · Ancient · Religious Scripture · Greek
Abstract
Situation. Under Roman practice of the 150s, believers could be executed simply for admitting the name and refusing sacrifice. Ugly rumours about secret meals spread. A teacher who still wore the cloak of a philosopher petitioned the imperial family in Greek.
Plea. He asks for trials on evidence: if no crime is proved, condemnation is unjust to the accused and shameful for the judges. Believers honour the Maker of heaven, keep oaths and marriages, pay tribute and pray for the throne.
Beliefs. The divine Reason that took flesh in Jesus had already given every person a spark of truth; Socrates was condemned for opposing the same demons. Many pages trace Hebrew prophecies forward to the Gospel story, and pagan myths are explained as demonic copies of it.
Worship. Near the end comes a rare eyewitness picture: washing new believers, a meal of bread and mixed wine over which thanks are given, and a weekly gathering where scripture is read, a leader preaches and gifts are shared with the poor.
Afterlife of the text. The author was beheaded about a decade later. His method of finding common ground with philosophers became a model for later defenders of the faith.
Key figures
- Justin: Christian philosopher and teacher at Rome
- Antoninus Pius: Emperor addressed in the petition
- Marcus Aurelius: Adopted son and heir, also addressed
- Hadrian: Earlier emperor whose rescript is appended
Summary
The First Apology is a defence of Christianity written in Greek by Justin, a convert and teacher of philosophy at Rome, and addressed to the emperor Antoninus Pius, his adopted sons Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus, the Senate and the Roman people. It dates from about 155. 'Apology' here means a formal defence speech, and Justin writes as a petitioner asking for justice on behalf of people 'unjustly hated and wantonly abused'. His first demand is legal. Christians are condemned for the name alone, without any inquiry into their conduct. Justin asks that charges be investigated and that only those proved guilty of crimes be punished; if the emperors refuse, he says, 'you can kill, but not hurt us'. He answers the common accusations that Christians are atheists, immoral or disloyal, explaining that they reject only the gods of the poets, worship the Creator, live chastely, pay their taxes and pray for the rulers. The middle of the book sets out what Christians believe and why. Justin argues that the Word, or Logos, who became man in Jesus, had already been partly present to all people through reason, so that whoever lived by reason, such as Socrates, was in a sense Christian. He gives a long argument from prophecy, showing how the Hebrew Scriptures foretold Christ's birth, death and rising and the spread of the church among the nations, and he claims that Greek myths are demonic imitations of the truth. The closing chapters are among the most valuable sources for early Christian life. Justin describes baptism and the Eucharist and gives the earliest surviving account of Sunday worship: readings from 'the memoirs of the apostles' or the prophets, a sermon, prayers, the bread and wine with water, thanksgiving and a collection for widows, orphans, the sick and strangers. He ends by appending a letter of the emperor Hadrian forbidding mob action against Christians. Justin's appeal to reason and his view of philosophy as a preparation for the gospel shaped later apologists, and his worship chapters are cited in modern discussions of liturgy.
Plot or Argument
- Address and demand for justice (1–12)
Justin petitions the emperors to examine Christians' conduct rather than condemn them for the name alone, and denies that they are atheists or criminals.
- Christian teaching and morals (13–29)
Christians worship the Creator, follow Christ's moral teaching on chastity, love of enemies and honesty, and obey civil authority.
- Proof from prophecy (30–53)
The Hebrew prophets foretold Christ's birth, miracles, death, resurrection and the conversion of the nations.
- Demons and imitations (54–64)
Greek myths and rites are presented as demonic counterfeits of the truths the prophets announced.
- Baptism, Eucharist and Sunday (65–67)
A description of initiation, the Eucharistic meal and the weekly assembly on the day of the sun.
- Conclusion (68)
A final appeal, with Hadrian's rescript on the treatment of Christians appended.
Lessons
Justice before judgment
Justin asks only that accused people be tried on evidence rather than labels, a principle of fairness that reaches far beyond his own case.
- Why does Justin think punishing Christians for the name alone is unjust?
- Where do people today judge by labels instead of conduct?
Faith and philosophy
Justin treats reason as a gift of the Word shared by all people, so philosophy can prepare for faith.
- What does Justin gain by calling Socrates a kind of Christian?
- What might a Platonist or a Jewish reader object?
Describing a community to outsiders
Justin explains Christian baptism and Sunday worship plainly to answer rumours.
- Why does Justin describe Christian worship in such detail?
- What modern groups face similar misunderstandings, and how might they respond?
For the Christian reader
Justin is the first great Christian apologist whose works survive, and he sealed his witness with his life in Rome around 165. His description of Sunday worship, baptism and the Lord's Supper is among the earliest outside the New Testament. Students can see in him a model of 1 Peter 3:15: giving a reasoned defence of the hope within, with gentleness and respect.
- What does Justin's account of Sunday worship share with worship in your own church?
- How does Justin use the best of Greek philosophy without surrendering the gospel?
Context
In the mid-second century Christianity was illegal but not systematically hunted. Under a policy set by Trajan, Christians were not to be sought out, but if accused and they refused to sacrifice to the gods they could be executed. Rumours of cannibalism and incest circulated about their closed meetings.
Composition
Justin wrote in Greek at Rome around 150–155, during the reign of Antoninus Pius. A shorter Second Apology, perhaps an appendix, followed. The text survives mainly in a single fourteenth-century manuscript in Paris.
Reception
Justin was executed around 165. Later apologists such as Tertullian and Clement of Alexandria built on his approach, and Eusebius's History of the Church preserves information about him. His account of Sunday worship is a key witness for historians of liturgy.
Comparisons
- Early Christian Writings: The Apostolic Fathers
The Apostolic Fathers address fellow believers; Justin, a generation later, is the first major writer to address the Roman authorities and educated pagans.
- The Passion of Perpetua and Felicity
Perpetua's trial before Hilarianus, fifty years later in Carthage, shows the kind of proceeding Justin protested against.
- Against Heresies
Irenaeus, who read Justin, writes a generation later to defend the faith against inner rivals rather than outer critics.
- The History of the Church
Eusebius quotes Justin and preserves the story of his life and death.
- Confessions
Augustine also came to Christianity through philosophy, and like Justin saw Platonism as a partial preparation for the gospel.
- On the Incarnation of the Word
Athanasius develops Justin's teaching on the Logos into a full account of the Word made flesh.
Quotes
Frequently cited
“you can kill, but not hurt us”
Frequently cited
“And on the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together to one place, and the memoirs of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read, as long as time permits”
“those who lived reasonably are Christians, even though they have been thought atheists; as, among the Greeks, Socrates and Heraclitus, and men like them”
For Students
A reading companion for classical Christian high school students. See the student guide.
Reading Guide
Watch for
- Justin's legal argument in chapters 2–4.
- How he answers the charge of atheism.
- The idea of the Word shared by all people (chapter 46).
- The worship chapters (65–67).
Key terms and names
- Apology
- A formal speech of defence, not an expression of regret.
- Logos
- The Word or Reason of God, which Justin says became man in Jesus and is partly present in all people.
- Eucharist
- 'Thanksgiving': the blessed bread and wine shared by baptized Christians.
- Rescript
- A written imperial reply with the force of law, like Hadrian's appended letter.
Seminar Questions
- Comprehension To whom is the Apology addressed?
- Comprehension What happens at the Christian assembly 'on the day called Sunday'?
- Interpretation Why does Justin compare the treatment of Christians with that of Socrates?
- Interpretation Is Justin's argument from prophecy likely to persuade a Roman senator? Why or why not?
- Interpretation How does Justin use the idea of the Word to connect Greek philosophy with Christianity?
- Big Question Should a government ever punish people for belonging to a group rather than for what they have done?
Faith Connections
- 1 Peter 3:15 (Scripture)
'Be ready always to give an answer [apologia] to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you.'
- Acts 17:22-31 (Scripture)
Paul's speech at Athens also seeks common ground with Greek thought.
- Plato, Apology (Great Conversation)
Justin's title and his appeal to Socrates deliberately recall Socrates' defence before Athens.
Logic and Rhetoric
Central argument: Christians should be judged on their conduct, which is blameless; their faith is reasonable, foretold by prophecy and the fulfilment of the truth partly glimpsed by philosophers.
Rhetorical device: appeal to the audience's own values. Justin addresses the emperors as 'pious' and 'philosophers' and asks them to live up to those titles by judging fairly.
Debate: Resolved: that Justin's appeal to reason was a better strategy than an appeal to tolerance.
Memory Work
you can kill, but not hurt us
And on the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together to one place, and the memoirs of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read, as long as time permits
Writing Prompts
Essay: Explain how Justin uses both Roman law and Greek philosophy to defend Christians. Which part of his case is stronger?
Comparison with The Passion of Perpetua and Felicity: Compare Justin's legal appeal with Perpetua's courtroom testimony. What does each reveal about Roman justice and Christian identity?
Creative Prompts
- Fiction
Write a short reply from a Roman official to Justin, either granting or refusing his request, and give reasons the emperor might accept.
- Essay
Compare Justin's description of Sunday worship (chapters 65–67) with a worship service you know; list what has changed and what has stayed the same.
- Dialogue
Write a dialogue in which Justin answers a Roman official's questions about what Christians do on Sundays.
Further Reading
- Dialogue with Trypho, Justin Martyr
Justin's longer debate with a Jewish teacher.
- The History of the Church, Eusebius
Verification notes
Full text from the Dods and Reith translation in ANF vol. 1 (1885) via CCEL, footnotes removed and Coxe's bracketed insertions kept; quotations matched to the stored text. Dating follows standard scholarship (c. 150–155).
No verification flags recorded.