Work record
The Massachusetts Body of Liberties
The General Court of Massachusetts Bay (drafted chiefly by Nathaniel Ward)The Massachusetts Body of Liberties by The General Court of Massachusetts Bay (drafted chiefly by Nathaniel Ward) (1641)The Body of Liberties is the first code of laws adopted in New England and one of the earliest bills of rights in the English-speaking world.1641 · Renaissance Early Modern · Political Theory · English
Abstract
Origins. For a decade the Puritan colony was ruled largely at its magistrates' discretion, and freemen demanded a written code so that power would be limited by known rules. A minister with legal training produced the version adopted in December 1641.
Due process. The opening article bars taking anyone's life, reputation, freedom, family or property except under an explicit law or, lacking one, the Word of God. This principle bound magistrates as well as subjects.
Trials. Further articles promise equal justice, appeals, juries, protection from double punishment, strict limits on torture, two or three witnesses in capital cases and a ban on barbarous bodily penalties.
Particular groups. Sections address freemen in government and then wives, children, servants, foreigners and domestic animals, shielding each from cruelty. Wives are protected from beatings, servants who flee harsh masters are sheltered and shipwrecked sailors are cared for.
Slavery and severity. One article permitted enslaving war captives and people who were sold, and the capital laws, citing Moses, imposed death for idolatry, witchcraft, blasphemy and other offences. Each capital law carries marginal references to the books of Moses.
Legacy. Superseded by a fuller printed code in 1648, the document foreshadows many protections of the American Bill of Rights. It shows both the Puritan hope of ruling by God's law and the limits of that hope.
Key figures
- Nathaniel Ward: Puritan minister and lawyer, principal drafter
- John Cotton: Boston minister who prepared an earlier draft
- John Winthrop: Governor of the colony
Summary
The Body of Liberties is the first code of laws adopted in New England and one of the earliest bills of rights in the English-speaking world. The Puritan settlers of Massachusetts Bay had governed for a decade largely by the discretion of their magistrates. Many freemen feared that this left them at the mercy of their rulers, and they pressed for written laws. After several drafts, the General Court adopted the Body of Liberties in December 1641, and ordered it to be read and weighed at every General Court for the next three years. The code contains 98 numbered liberties followed by a list of capital laws. The first liberty is a sweeping guarantee of due process: no person's life, honour, liberty, family or goods may be taken except by virtue of an express law of the country, or, where no law exists, by the Word of God. Many liberties follow on fair trial: equal justice to all, right to counsel and to appeal, jury trial, no double punishment for the same offence, no torture except under strict limits, conviction of a capital crime only on the testimony of two or three witnesses, and, in the forty-sixth liberty, no bodily punishments that are inhumane, barbarous or cruel. Other sections set out the liberties of freemen in government, such as the right to vote, to speak in town meetings and to petition. Separate sections then treat the liberties of women, children, servants, foreigners and strangers, and even brute creatures. A married woman is to be free from beating by her husband; children are protected against unnatural severity by parents; servants who flee cruel masters are to be sheltered; shipwrecked strangers are to be relieved; and no one may be cruel to domestic animals. The ninety-first liberty forbids slavery except for captives taken in just wars and those who sell themselves or are sold, a serious exception that allowed slavery in the colony. The capital laws, each with marginal citations from the books of Moses, punish idolatry, witchcraft, blasphemy, murder, kidnapping, false witness in capital cases, rebellion and certain sexual crimes with death. Readers will see both the Puritan hope of a commonwealth ruled by God's law and the severity of its penalties. The Body of Liberties was replaced in 1648 by the fuller Laws and Liberties of Massachusetts. Its protections anticipate many in the U.S. Bill of Rights.
Plot or Argument
- Preamble
The Court affirms that liberties are the tranquillity of churches and commonwealth and decrees them for ever.
- Liberties 1–57: rights of persons and procedure
Due process, equal justice, trial, witnesses, limits on torture and on cruel punishment.
- Liberties 58–78: liberties of freemen
Elections, town government, freedom of speech in assemblies and control of public money.
- Liberties 79–95: women, children, servants, foreigners and animals
Protections for the weak, with the slavery exception in Liberty 91.
- Capital laws
Twelve crimes punishable by death, each supported by citations from the law of Moses.
- Church liberties and conclusion
Liberties of the churches and provision that the code be read and reviewed.
Lessons
Rule of law
The first liberty says no one may be punished except by an express law. Rulers as well as ruled must be bound by known laws.
- What does the first liberty protect?
- Why did the freemen want written laws instead of the magistrates' discretion?
Protecting the weak
The code gives particular liberties to wives, children, servants, strangers and animals. Christian law cares for those without power.
- Which liberties protect women and children?
- Why would a Puritan code protect animals from cruelty?
A serious failure
Liberty 91 allowed slavery of captives and those sold. Even a code shaped by Scripture can fall short of the justice it seeks.
- What exception does Liberty 91 make?
- How should we judge a document that protects many liberties but permits slavery?
God's law and civil law
The capital laws cite the law of Moses. Students can consider how Christians have related the civil laws of Israel to the laws of a commonwealth.
- Why do the capital laws include Bible references?
- Should a modern state adopt the civil penalties of ancient Israel? Why or why not?
Context
The Massachusetts Bay Colony was founded in 1630 by Puritans seeking to build a godly commonwealth. Its magistrates, led by John Winthrop, at first judged without a written code.
Composition
Drafts were prepared by John Cotton and by Nathaniel Ward. The General Court adopted Ward's version, revised, in December 1641.
Reception
The code was superseded by the Laws and Liberties of 1648, the first printed law code in English America. Historians see the Body of Liberties as a forerunner of American bills of rights.
Comparisons
- Magna Carta
The first liberty echoes Magna Carta's promise that no free man be harmed except by the law of the land.
- The Founding Documents
Many of these liberties anticipate the U.S. Bill of Rights.
- The Petition of Right (1628), the Habeas Corpus Act (1679) and the English Bill of Rights (1689)
English documents of the same century address similar fears of arbitrary power.
Quotes
“No mans life shall be taken away, no mans honour or good name shall be stayned, no mans person shall be arested, restrayned, banished, dismembred, nor any wayes punished”
“For bodilie punishments we allow amongst us none that are inhumane Barbarous or cruel.”
For Students
A reading companion for classical Christian high school students. See the student guide.
Reading Guide
Watch for
- Guarantees of due process and fair trial.
- Liberties for particular groups.
- The slavery exception in Liberty 91.
- The biblical citations in the capital laws.
Key terms and names
- General Court
- The legislature of the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
- Freeman
- A church member admitted to full political rights in the colony.
- Due process
- Fair legal procedure required before a person can be punished or deprived of rights.
- Capital law
- A law punishing a crime with death.
Seminar Questions
- Comprehension What does the first liberty promise?
- Comprehension What does Liberty 46 forbid?
- Interpretation Why might the colonists have feared their magistrates' discretion?
- Interpretation How does the code show care for the weak?
- Interpretation How should we judge a code that limits cruelty but allows slavery?
- Interpretation Why do you think the code requires two or three witnesses for capital crimes?
- Big Question What is the right relationship between God's law and the laws of a state?
Faith Connections
- Deuteronomy 17:6 (Scripture)
"At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death": cited in Liberty 47's rule.
- Proverbs 12:10 (Scripture)
"A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast": the basis of the liberty for animals.
- Exodus 21:16 (Scripture)
"He that stealeth a man... shall surely be put to death": the capital law against kidnapping.
Logic and Rhetoric
Central argument: A Christian commonwealth must bind its rulers by written laws that guarantee due process, protect the weak and follow God's Word.
Rhetorical device: anaphora. Liberty 1 repeats "no mans... no mans..." to build a sweeping guarantee.
Debate: Resolved: that a nation's laws should be grounded in biblical principles.
Memory Work
No mans life shall be taken away, no mans honour or good name shall be stayned, no mans person shall be arested, restrayned, banished, dismembred, nor any wayes punished
Writing Prompts
Essay: Explain how the Body of Liberties anticipates the U.S. Bill of Rights, and where it differs.
Comparison with The Founding Documents: Compare the Body of Liberties with the U.S. Bill of Rights.
Creative Prompts
- Classroom
Choose five liberties and rewrite them in modern English; then find their counterparts in the U.S. Bill of Rights.
- Essay
Assess the Body of Liberties as a Christian attempt to secure justice, including its failures.
- Dialogue
Write a town-meeting debate in 1641 over whether the colony needs written laws.
Further Reading
- The Puritan Dilemma: The Story of John Winthrop, Edmund S. Morgan
Verification notes
Text from Old South Leaflets no. 164 (c. 1900), as transcribed by the Hanover Historical Texts Project, with original spelling. The drafting by Ward and Cotton and the December 1641 adoption follow standard histories.
No verification flags recorded.